According to Newtons III laws, assuming they are true and accurate, is it necessary to assume that there MUST have been SOMETHING that set of the big bank, AKA set the whole thing in motion? Given the amount of mass in the universe, would it stand to reason that something extremely powerful would have to "act" upon the material that was stationary and whole?
According to Newtons III laws, assuming they are true and accurate, is it necessary to assume that there MUST have been SOMETHING that set of the big bank, AKA set the whole thing in motion? Given the amount of mass in the universe, would it stand to reason that something extremely powerful would have to "act" upon the material that was stationary and whole?
ReplyDelete